Change of Custody versus Change of Visitation- Different Standards and Why You Should Know the Difference

It is an often misunderstood nuance in Ohio family law.

In 1999, the Ohio Supreme Court held in Braatz v. Braatz, that whereas one is required to show a change of circumstances in order to modify a custody determination, a chance of circumstances need not be shown to modify visitation.

Let’s break this down.  Involvement in a child’s life can be divided into two parts, decision making and time. Custody is a term that refers to who is legally entitled to make decisions regarding the care of a child.  When parents are married, both parents are considered custodians of minor children of the marriage and are equally entitled to make decisions regarding the children.  When a child is born to an unwed mother, the mother is the sole custodian until a Court orders otherwise.

Courts can make determinations of custody in the event that married parents are separated, married parents are seeking a divorce, or an unmarried parent is seeking an order.  When making a determination of custody, the court ordinarily makes one of two chooses.  Name one parent custodian or both parents custodians.  If one parent has custody, she is referred to as the legal custodian or residential parent.  If both parents have custody, this is called Shared Parenting.  When one parent is named custodian, the other parent is typically given visitation rights. Visitation rights allow the parent to have time with the minor child.

If a person with visitation rights is seeking a modification of a court order, to have more time with his child for instance, he does not need to show a change of
circumstances. Instead, the court must consider a number of factors set forth in Ohio law and ultimately determine that it is in the best interest of the child.

Alternately, if a parent wishes to have a different parent named custodian or have a Shared Parenting Plan modified, he must show a change of circumstances with the minor child or custodian parent or either parent subject to a Shared Parenting Plan, and that the benefit of making the change outweighs the harm and it is in the best interest of the minor child. The Court must consider a number of factors set forth by Ohio law when determining the best interest of the minor child.

Hence, the hurdles to having a change of custodian or Shared Parenting Plan are much greater than a change in visitation. This nuance in the law is often misunderstood by attorneys and court personnel alike and can make all the difference in the success of your visitation modification.

Elizabeth
Elizabeth
Owner and Attorney at The Perla Law Firm, LLC

2 Comments

  1. Rita Cslhoun says:

    I am the parent and guardian of a 22 year old son who is so impaired that he will never reach the age of majority.
    I continue to receive child support, however, the county board is requiring me to surrender the support to the state in lieu of a medicaid waiver which would allow the child to attend adult day care.
    The county has no other services available, housing and waivers are wait
    listed, they even lied about self pay services, claiming that the child had to
    be on a waiver before we could even discuss any services.
    The county, is refusing service to the child because I am refusing to
    surrender the child support as these are not public funds.
    I am seeking to certify the child as a “castle child” to ensure continued
    support and to protect the child from the county’s intent to terminate the
    support as the state is not interested in collecting the funds, but is on a
    mission to remove these funds from our household.
    The childs father earns $100,000 per year and bh law, should be required to
    support this child according to state guidelines but this has not been the
    case as he has been created with a shared parenting order but is not
    required to share parent.
    I need to move this case out of Cuyahoga County as county has their own
    agenda.
    Can you assist or suggest a course of action?

    The

    • Administrator says:

      If you would like to discuss your individual case, please call our office directly at (440) 333-2503.